I read 'The Myth of Monogamy' awhile back. Fine up 'til the last chapter when they decided to start moralizing and then basically went against nearly everything they'd presented in the previous chapters. ("Even though we may be biologically non-monogamous by nature, it's still better to be monogamous.") ...Strange book, to do a 180 like that at the end.
Thanks for posting this. I was just talking with someone about it but couldn't remember all the markers or characteristics that define a monogamous species.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-17 08:36 pm (UTC)Thanks for posting this. I was just talking with someone about it but couldn't remember all the markers or characteristics that define a monogamous species.